I_Kinda_Fail

I mean, she's only half reptile, the other half is humanoid, isn't it? It's like with centaurs, would the top half of a female centaur have breasts, or would their lower half have nipples for their young? How would they drink from the human nipples if they're so high up in the air? Do they lose their horse nipples?

Regardless, it's fantasy, and this is apparently someone's addition to the fantasy.

Quite so, and that's where the artist went.

She's a god, not a reptile, and thus can take whatever form she wishes, anatomy and reality be damned.

Draco_Esques

Crondis was a crocodile turned goddess by Tumeken. Crondis is a reptilian goddess.

Was she now? Okay, I'll bite, but tell me, what would be your source for making that claim?

Draco_Esques

Your centaurs are two halves of a mammal. Do they have a mostly able bodied foal bottom running around with a crappy human infant flailing around up top because we don't have the motor skills foals gain at birth? No. It's a bad example.

Reptiles don't have tits. They house MAMMARY glands because they're for MAMMALS.

This also makes me want to touch on the feline humanoids, why do they only have two functioning mammary glands? Felines have more than 2 young or two mammaries.

Fantasy lacks any knowledge of the creatures we twist to fit our idea of humanoid.

Real-world rules need not apply. Gods sit in their own classification - even if one started out life as one thing, upon ascension they are no longer that thing, and are no longer beholden to any limits/rules/anatomy/whatever that may have applied to said thing.

While there is often value in basing fantastical elements of fictional universes on real-world analogues (primarily for ease of understanding on the part of the audience), doing so is not a necessity.