Hello sir/madam!

Thank you for the post!

In the blog, the comparison is done based on the end result, produced by a single fitting of two different modules (in this case how much damage will be applied). So the question being answer is “How much more damage is mitigated by module B compared to module A” (effectiveness comparison for single fitting).

Now, you have done a magnificent work, but you are answering a slightly different question. Your example answers the question of “How many of module A does it take to get the same result as a single module B” (required modules to reach same effectiveness). Something that is very useful in many cases indeed.

So module B is 40% more effective than module A
but
it takes around 1.32 A modules to reach the same effectiveness of a single module B.

We will try to be more clear in future on how we communicate these kind of details.

Thank you again for the post!

This has been identified. We want to look into this. The rules that are being established through the tiericide process will be used to drive changes in manufacturing and distributions.

Yes they will change.

There will be a blog next week that explains the plan.